The aim of this article is to rethink the indispensable connection between aesthetics and life sciences. According to a consolidated tradition, the fundamental point of intersection between the two disciplines is represented by the concept of form. It is 125 Thaumazien_2021.indd 125 13/05/2021 12:02:59 Pier Alberto Porceddu Cilione therefore to morphology that the task of thinking about the nature of form and the form of nature is ascribed. In this sense, Goethe and the debates on morphology arising from his texts represent an essential speculative starting point. However, the Goetheian teaching is, in this context, even more compelling, because morphology is already configured as a science of form that suspends the kinetic difference between natural and artificial beings, between nature and art/technique. If nature, physis, has still been thought of by Aristotle as the realm of arché, it will be a question of comprehend how, through the testimony of Heidegger and Schürmann, it is possible to metaphysically found morphology by understanding the essential “anarchic” character of nature.

Beyond the arché. Aristotle, Goethe, Heidegger, Schürmann

Porceddu Cilione
2020

Abstract

The aim of this article is to rethink the indispensable connection between aesthetics and life sciences. According to a consolidated tradition, the fundamental point of intersection between the two disciplines is represented by the concept of form. It is 125 Thaumazien_2021.indd 125 13/05/2021 12:02:59 Pier Alberto Porceddu Cilione therefore to morphology that the task of thinking about the nature of form and the form of nature is ascribed. In this sense, Goethe and the debates on morphology arising from his texts represent an essential speculative starting point. However, the Goetheian teaching is, in this context, even more compelling, because morphology is already configured as a science of form that suspends the kinetic difference between natural and artificial beings, between nature and art/technique. If nature, physis, has still been thought of by Aristotle as the realm of arché, it will be a question of comprehend how, through the testimony of Heidegger and Schürmann, it is possible to metaphysically found morphology by understanding the essential “anarchic” character of nature.
Morphology; Form; kinesis; Art; Life
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
114-Article Text-275-1-10-20210706 copia.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Accesso ristretto
Dimensione 890.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
890.82 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1044985
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact