This paper summarizes in a historiographic perspective the premises that around the mid-twentieth centu- ry led to the hypothesis of a partial forgery of the Epistola. Taking for granted those premises, during the following decades a lot of papers were published arguing for its partial spuriousness. Once those premises have been dismissed by philological evidences all those papers should consequently be set aside.

Dante Alighieri e l’Epistola a Cangrande. Tra storia della filologia estoriadell’editoria

Paolo Pellegrini
2020

Abstract

This paper summarizes in a historiographic perspective the premises that around the mid-twentieth centu- ry led to the hypothesis of a partial forgery of the Epistola. Taking for granted those premises, during the following decades a lot of papers were published arguing for its partial spuriousness. Once those premises have been dismissed by philological evidences all those papers should consequently be set aside.
Dante, Epistola to Cagrande, forgery, Bruno Nardi, Augusto Mancini, Francesco Mazzoni
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PELLEGRINI_STEFI_2020-10_01.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Abstract
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 72.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
72.07 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1044925
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact