The essay examines the legislative protection of the whistleblower introduced by Act n. 179/17, focusing on a specific aspect, namely the rule on the burden of proof. As Act no. 179 establishes a reversed burden of proof in favour of the employee, the analysis compares this rules with those otherwise applicable in the case of retaliatory, discriminatory and unfair dismissals. After highlighting differences, systemic issues, and possible risks, the author proposes some interpretative solutions.
La prova del licenziamento ritorsivo nella legge 179/17 sul whistleblowing
Marco Peruzzi
2020-01-01
Abstract
The essay examines the legislative protection of the whistleblower introduced by Act n. 179/17, focusing on a specific aspect, namely the rule on the burden of proof. As Act no. 179 establishes a reversed burden of proof in favour of the employee, the analysis compares this rules with those otherwise applicable in the case of retaliatory, discriminatory and unfair dismissals. After highlighting differences, systemic issues, and possible risks, the author proposes some interpretative solutions.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
