INTRODUCTION: Ankle fractures account for 4% of all fractures and treatment of those involving the Posterior Malleolus remains controversial. Clinical and radiological outcomes in a cohort of patients with Posterior Malleolus fractures conservatively treated were retrospectively evaluated; furthermore, a treatment algorithm was suggested.METHODS: Patients were divided according to Bartonicek classification. The clinical evaluation was made with OMAS/AOFAS scores; the radiological evaluation with Van Dijk classification for post-traumatic arthritis.RESULTS: Clinical outcome worsened with the severity of Bartonicek classification, but early degenerative changes were not correlated neither to the clinical outcome nor to the injury pattern. Clinical and radiological outcomes depended on the damage of the syndesmosis as articular step-offs and tibio-fibular notch involvement.DISCUSSION: We recommend conservative treatment for Bartonicek type I, type II and type III fractures, the latter when undisplaced and without tibial plafond depression. We suggest surgical treatment for type IV and displaced type III fractures.
Can treatment of posterior malleolus fractures with tibio-fibular instability be usefully addressed by Bartonicek classification?
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
			
			
			
		
		
		
		
			
			
				
				
					
					
					
					
						
							
						
						
					
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
			
			
		
			
			
				
				
					
					
					
					
						
							
						
						
					
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
			
			
		
			
			
				
				
					
					
					
					
						
							
						
						
					
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
			
			
		
			
			
				
				
					
					
					
					
						
							
						
						
					
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
			
			
		
			
			
				
				
					
					
					
					
						
							
						
						
					
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
			
			
		
			
			
				
				
					
					
					
					
						
							
						
						
					
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
			
			
		
			
			
				
				
					
					
					
					
						
							
						
						
					
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
			
			
		
		
		
		
	
T. Maluta
						
						
						
							Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;E. M. SamailaWriting – Review & Editing
;A. AmarossiData Curation
;A. DorigottiMethodology
;M. Ricci;E. Vecchini;B. MagnanWriting – Review & Editing
			2022-01-01
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Ankle fractures account for 4% of all fractures and treatment of those involving the Posterior Malleolus remains controversial. Clinical and radiological outcomes in a cohort of patients with Posterior Malleolus fractures conservatively treated were retrospectively evaluated; furthermore, a treatment algorithm was suggested.METHODS: Patients were divided according to Bartonicek classification. The clinical evaluation was made with OMAS/AOFAS scores; the radiological evaluation with Van Dijk classification for post-traumatic arthritis.RESULTS: Clinical outcome worsened with the severity of Bartonicek classification, but early degenerative changes were not correlated neither to the clinical outcome nor to the injury pattern. Clinical and radiological outcomes depended on the damage of the syndesmosis as articular step-offs and tibio-fibular notch involvement.DISCUSSION: We recommend conservative treatment for Bartonicek type I, type II and type III fractures, the latter when undisplaced and without tibial plafond depression. We suggest surgical treatment for type IV and displaced type III fractures.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 
									
										
										
										
										
											
												
												
												    
												
											
										
									
									
										
										
											Can treatment of posterior malleolus fractures with tibio-fibular.pdf
										
																				
									
										
											 solo utenti autorizzati 
											Licenza:
											
											
												Copyright dell'editore
												
												
												
											
										 
									
									
										Dimensione
										2.15 MB
									 
									
										Formato
										Adobe PDF
									 
										
										
								 | 
								2.15 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia | 
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



