Introduction: Prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) ranges from 30% to 60% of all patients with aortic valve stenosis (AVS). At present, little is known about the best management of CAD in patients undergoing trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence, management and the immediate clinical impact of CAD in this population, with a special focus on the feasibility and safety of a physiologically-guided revascularization strategy.Methods and results: A total of 287 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI in our center were retrospectively included in the analysis. Those presenting CAD (123, 43%) were divided in three groups, according to the therapeutic strategy adopted by the operator: optimal medical therapy group (42 out of 123, 34%), preventive-PCI for angiographically significant coronary lesions (34 out of 123, 28%) and a physiologically-guided strategy (47 out of 123, 38%). The mean Logistic EuroSCORE was 31 +/- 24% in the CAD population, with a higher risk profile in medical therapy group. TAVI procedural success in the overall population was 96%. Thirty-day clinical outcome showed a higher incidence of MACEs in the optimal medical therapy and the preventive PCI group (11.9% and 5.9% respectively), with no occurrence of adverse events in the FFR-guided group.Conclusions: The best management of CAD in TAVI is still under investigation. Despite a relatively limited sample size, our findings demonstrate the feasibility and safety of a physiologically-guided revascularization strategy. Larger trials are needed to confirm our observations and to assess the long-term clinical impact. (C) 2017 The Czech Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.

Coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. A single centre registry on prevalence, management and immediate clinical impact

Zivelonghi, Carlo;Lunardi, Mattia;Pesarini, Gabriele;Scarsini, Roberto;Piccoli, Anna;Ferrero, Valeria;Gottin, Leonardo;Milano, Aldo;Faggian, Giuseppe;Vassanelli, Corrado;Ribichini, Flavio
2017-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: Prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) ranges from 30% to 60% of all patients with aortic valve stenosis (AVS). At present, little is known about the best management of CAD in patients undergoing trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence, management and the immediate clinical impact of CAD in this population, with a special focus on the feasibility and safety of a physiologically-guided revascularization strategy.Methods and results: A total of 287 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI in our center were retrospectively included in the analysis. Those presenting CAD (123, 43%) were divided in three groups, according to the therapeutic strategy adopted by the operator: optimal medical therapy group (42 out of 123, 34%), preventive-PCI for angiographically significant coronary lesions (34 out of 123, 28%) and a physiologically-guided strategy (47 out of 123, 38%). The mean Logistic EuroSCORE was 31 +/- 24% in the CAD population, with a higher risk profile in medical therapy group. TAVI procedural success in the overall population was 96%. Thirty-day clinical outcome showed a higher incidence of MACEs in the optimal medical therapy and the preventive PCI group (11.9% and 5.9% respectively), with no occurrence of adverse events in the FFR-guided group.Conclusions: The best management of CAD in TAVI is still under investigation. Despite a relatively limited sample size, our findings demonstrate the feasibility and safety of a physiologically-guided revascularization strategy. Larger trials are needed to confirm our observations and to assess the long-term clinical impact. (C) 2017 The Czech Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
2017
Aortic valve stenosis; Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI); Coronary angiography; Myocardial revascularization
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1032988
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact