The currently available data suggests that many laboratory parameters are deranged in patients with COVID-19, and some of these may also be considered significant predictors of adverse clinical outcomes. The most frequent abnormalities were lymphopenia (35–75% of cases), increased values of CRP (75–93% of cases), LDH (27–92% of cases), ESR (up to 85% of cases) and D-dimer (36–43% of cases), as well as low concentrations of serum albumin (50–98% of cases) and hemoglobin (41–50%). Many laboratory abnormalities were instead predictive of adverse outcome, including increased white blood cell count, increased neutrophil count, decreased lymphocyte count, decreased albumin, increased LDH, ALT, AST, bilirubin, creatinine, cardiac troponins, D-dimer, prothrombin time, procalcitonin and CRP values.

Laboratory abnormalities in patients with COVID-2019 infection

Lippi, Giuseppe
;
2020-01-01

Abstract

The currently available data suggests that many laboratory parameters are deranged in patients with COVID-19, and some of these may also be considered significant predictors of adverse clinical outcomes. The most frequent abnormalities were lymphopenia (35–75% of cases), increased values of CRP (75–93% of cases), LDH (27–92% of cases), ESR (up to 85% of cases) and D-dimer (36–43% of cases), as well as low concentrations of serum albumin (50–98% of cases) and hemoglobin (41–50%). Many laboratory abnormalities were instead predictive of adverse outcome, including increased white blood cell count, increased neutrophil count, decreased lymphocyte count, decreased albumin, increased LDH, ALT, AST, bilirubin, creatinine, cardiac troponins, D-dimer, prothrombin time, procalcitonin and CRP values.
2020
COVID-19; coronavirus; laboratory medicine; laboratory tests; prognosis
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1012667
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 378
  • Scopus 645
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 554
social impact