Introduction: There is no consensus on which is the best way to maintain initial reduction of a distal radius fractures (DRFs). The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that below elbow cast (BEC) is equivalent to above elbow cast (AEC) in maintaining initial reduction of DRFs. This paper will report on midterm results. Methods: SLA-VER is a prospective, monocentric, randomized, parallel-group, open label, blinded endpoint evaluation non-inferiority trial (PROBE design) comparing the efficacy of AECs and BECs in DRFs conservative treatment in terms of loss of radial height (RH), radial inclination (RI) and volar tilt (VT) during cast immobilization (average 35 days) of 353 consecutive DRFs. Non-inferiority thresholds are 2 mm for radial height, 3° for radial inclination and 3° for volar tilt. Study population will be 353 patients, randomized into 2 groups (AEC vs BEC). One-hundred patients have completed the study so far. Results: Patients in BEC group lost 1,75 mm of RH, 2,9° of RI and 4,5° of VT over the course of cast immobilization. Patients in AEC group lost 1,71 mm of RH, 2,2° of RI and 4,8° of VT. Raw differences between average loss of RH, RI, VT during treatment between study groups were respectively 0,04 mm, 0,7° and 0,3°. Logistic and ANCOVA models have been used to correct for confouding variables. Conclusions: Difference of loss of RH, RI and VT between the two groups are all below the non inferiority thresholds. Cast type does not seem to affect maintenance of reduction in conservatively managed DRFs.

SLA-VER: study protocol description and preliminar results of the first italian RCT on conservative treatment of distal radial fractures

Maluta, Tommaso
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Cengarle, Matteo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Dib, Giovanni
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Lavini, Franco
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Ricci, Matteo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Vecchini, Eugenio
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Samaila, Elena Manuela
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Magnan, Bruno
Membro del Collaboration Group
2019-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: There is no consensus on which is the best way to maintain initial reduction of a distal radius fractures (DRFs). The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that below elbow cast (BEC) is equivalent to above elbow cast (AEC) in maintaining initial reduction of DRFs. This paper will report on midterm results. Methods: SLA-VER is a prospective, monocentric, randomized, parallel-group, open label, blinded endpoint evaluation non-inferiority trial (PROBE design) comparing the efficacy of AECs and BECs in DRFs conservative treatment in terms of loss of radial height (RH), radial inclination (RI) and volar tilt (VT) during cast immobilization (average 35 days) of 353 consecutive DRFs. Non-inferiority thresholds are 2 mm for radial height, 3° for radial inclination and 3° for volar tilt. Study population will be 353 patients, randomized into 2 groups (AEC vs BEC). One-hundred patients have completed the study so far. Results: Patients in BEC group lost 1,75 mm of RH, 2,9° of RI and 4,5° of VT over the course of cast immobilization. Patients in AEC group lost 1,71 mm of RH, 2,2° of RI and 4,8° of VT. Raw differences between average loss of RH, RI, VT during treatment between study groups were respectively 0,04 mm, 0,7° and 0,3°. Logistic and ANCOVA models have been used to correct for confouding variables. Conclusions: Difference of loss of RH, RI and VT between the two groups are all below the non inferiority thresholds. Cast type does not seem to affect maintenance of reduction in conservatively managed DRFs.
2019
distal radius fracture, cast, above-elbow cast, below-elbow cast, short arm cast, long arm cast
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
sla-ver.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Descrizione: studio prospettico, randomizzato, paralello, open label, blinded al FU
Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Accesso ristretto
Dimensione 1.78 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.78 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1008741
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact