This paper aims at checking how the Greeks of Asia Minor considered the passage of Alexander the Great. A range of elements are taken into consideration, as the lack of an “Alexander era”, the physical presence or absence of the young king into the poleis, the real traces of an Alexander cult before his death, the existence of fourth century historians who choose the conquest of Asia as a chronological point of passage, etc. Actually the signs of continuity are more numerous and strong, both in Alexander’s behavior and in the whole attitude of the Greeks. It is very difficult to find evidence of the awareness of a great changement.
Riflessi microasiatici della spedizione di Alessandro il Grande (elementi di periodizzazione nel IV secolo a. C.)
PRANDI, LUISA
2016-01-01
Abstract
This paper aims at checking how the Greeks of Asia Minor considered the passage of Alexander the Great. A range of elements are taken into consideration, as the lack of an “Alexander era”, the physical presence or absence of the young king into the poleis, the real traces of an Alexander cult before his death, the existence of fourth century historians who choose the conquest of Asia as a chronological point of passage, etc. Actually the signs of continuity are more numerous and strong, both in Alexander’s behavior and in the whole attitude of the Greeks. It is very difficult to find evidence of the awareness of a great changement.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Prandi_Riflessi microasiatici_2016.pdf
accesso aperto
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
294.15 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
294.15 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.