LIMITING THE SCOPE: WHICH COURTS AND WHICH LEGISLATORS? THE PHENOMENON: WHY ARE TENSIONS AND INFLUENCES BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATORS INEVITABLE? NON-MAJORITARIAN OR ANTI-MAJORITARIAN? PHYSIOLOGY AND EXCEPTIONS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATOR. THE NORWEGIAN CASE: A LIMITED, SOMEHOW DEFERENTIAL JUDICIAL REVIEW... ..AND ITS 10 PECULIARITIES.COURTS AND LEGISLATORS: WINNERS AND LOSERS OR A MATTER OF TRUST? WHAT LESSON FOR COMPARATIVE LAWYERS?

COURTS AND THE LEGISLATOR: TENSIONS AND INFLUENCES IN NORWAY AND IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

NICOLINI, Matteo;PALERMO, Francesco
2015-01-01

Abstract

LIMITING THE SCOPE: WHICH COURTS AND WHICH LEGISLATORS? THE PHENOMENON: WHY ARE TENSIONS AND INFLUENCES BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATORS INEVITABLE? NON-MAJORITARIAN OR ANTI-MAJORITARIAN? PHYSIOLOGY AND EXCEPTIONS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATOR. THE NORWEGIAN CASE: A LIMITED, SOMEHOW DEFERENTIAL JUDICIAL REVIEW... ..AND ITS 10 PECULIARITIES.COURTS AND LEGISLATORS: WINNERS AND LOSERS OR A MATTER OF TRUST? WHAT LESSON FOR COMPARATIVE LAWYERS?
978-94-6236-578-0
Norwegian Constitution, Judicial Review of Legislation, Judicial Dialogue, Høyesterett, Prejudikat, RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATOR
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/927604
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact