LIMITING THE SCOPE: WHICH COURTS AND WHICH LEGISLATORS? THE PHENOMENON: WHY ARE TENSIONS AND INFLUENCES BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATORS INEVITABLE? NON-MAJORITARIAN OR ANTI-MAJORITARIAN? PHYSIOLOGY AND EXCEPTIONS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATOR. THE NORWEGIAN CASE: A LIMITED, SOMEHOW DEFERENTIAL JUDICIAL REVIEW... ..AND ITS 10 PECULIARITIES.COURTS AND LEGISLATORS: WINNERS AND LOSERS OR A MATTER OF TRUST? WHAT LESSON FOR COMPARATIVE LAWYERS?
COURTS AND THE LEGISLATOR: TENSIONS AND INFLUENCES IN NORWAY AND IN A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
NICOLINI, Matteo;PALERMO, Francesco
2015-01-01
Abstract
LIMITING THE SCOPE: WHICH COURTS AND WHICH LEGISLATORS? THE PHENOMENON: WHY ARE TENSIONS AND INFLUENCES BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATORS INEVITABLE? NON-MAJORITARIAN OR ANTI-MAJORITARIAN? PHYSIOLOGY AND EXCEPTIONS IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATOR. THE NORWEGIAN CASE: A LIMITED, SOMEHOW DEFERENTIAL JUDICIAL REVIEW... ..AND ITS 10 PECULIARITIES.COURTS AND LEGISLATORS: WINNERS AND LOSERS OR A MATTER OF TRUST? WHAT LESSON FOR COMPARATIVE LAWYERS?
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
