Why in early modern England did medicine help define the individual by stigmatizing pathologies of insanity? What did the word individual mean in this period, when the notions of separateness and inseparability strangely coexisted? How did art respond to the growing need to identify and divide the mental insane from the social community of the (morally and mentally) sane? This volume raises some of these questions taking up and, at the same time, challenging received ideas on the phenomenon of internment famously described by Foucault, and revising the issue of distraction in the light of more recent medical, cultural, and literary studies on the subject. Starting from a survey of philosophy on madness in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the book addresses topics related to the poetical, theatrical, and narrative appropriation and contestation of contemporary medical knowledge. From popular ballads, to the plays of Shakespeare, Fletcher, Middleton, Dekker, Rowley, to Restoration comedy and spiritual autobiography, it shows how art generated fruitful tension between deterministic stances and the need to transcend them.

Distraction individualized: figures of insanity in early modern England.

BIGLIAZZI, Silvia
2012

Abstract

Why in early modern England did medicine help define the individual by stigmatizing pathologies of insanity? What did the word individual mean in this period, when the notions of separateness and inseparability strangely coexisted? How did art respond to the growing need to identify and divide the mental insane from the social community of the (morally and mentally) sane? This volume raises some of these questions taking up and, at the same time, challenging received ideas on the phenomenon of internment famously described by Foucault, and revising the issue of distraction in the light of more recent medical, cultural, and literary studies on the subject. Starting from a survey of philosophy on madness in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the book addresses topics related to the poetical, theatrical, and narrative appropriation and contestation of contemporary medical knowledge. From popular ballads, to the plays of Shakespeare, Fletcher, Middleton, Dekker, Rowley, to Restoration comedy and spiritual autobiography, it shows how art generated fruitful tension between deterministic stances and the need to transcend them.
9788895351711
Literature and Medicine; Early Modern England; Distraction
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11562/483551
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact