Musical works, like literary and visual ones, exist in relation to other preexisting works. Intertextuality is the very condition of artistic creation, and therefore all musical works are to some degree intertextual. Between the mid-fifteenth and the early-seventeenth century, however, emphatically and self-consciously intertextual composition acquired unprecedented importance. Why? Thisarticle offers a new perspective on this crucial question, taking its cue from recent studies of imitatio and its cultural meanings by literary historians and theorists. Focusing on the reworkings of a celebrated model, Johannes Ockeghem’s chanson “Fors seulement,” I discuss intertextual musical works as links in a chronological chain of pieces considered worthy of being remembered, reheard, and recomposed. These lines of authoritative compositions linked by exhibited intertextual connections testify to a perception of the past no longer as a generic “before,” but as history in the (early) modern and emphatic meaning of the term.
A past that lasts: reworking music and creating history at the dawn of modernity
BORGHETTI, VINCENZO
2013-01-01
Abstract
Musical works, like literary and visual ones, exist in relation to other preexisting works. Intertextuality is the very condition of artistic creation, and therefore all musical works are to some degree intertextual. Between the mid-fifteenth and the early-seventeenth century, however, emphatically and self-consciously intertextual composition acquired unprecedented importance. Why? Thisarticle offers a new perspective on this crucial question, taking its cue from recent studies of imitatio and its cultural meanings by literary historians and theorists. Focusing on the reworkings of a celebrated model, Johannes Ockeghem’s chanson “Fors seulement,” I discuss intertextual musical works as links in a chronological chain of pieces considered worthy of being remembered, reheard, and recomposed. These lines of authoritative compositions linked by exhibited intertextual connections testify to a perception of the past no longer as a generic “before,” but as history in the (early) modern and emphatic meaning of the term.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2-89 Borghetti.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Accesso ristretto
Dimensione
270.17 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
270.17 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.