Background: Several systematic reviews have investigated pancreatic stump management to reduce the postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate. The study aimed to evaluate if the parenchymal transection using the triple-row reinforced stapler decreases the incidence of POPF compared with ultrasonic transection after distal pancreatectomy (DP). Methods: a bicentric, phase 3, patient-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted. All patients submitted to elective DP from July 2018 through July 2020 were screened. Exclusion criteria were an extended resection, gastrointestinal resections or anastomoses, and a pancreatic thickness >17 mm measured at the point of parenchymal transection. The experimental group received the Endo GIA Reinforced Reload with Tri-Staple Technology (TS), while the control group the Harmonic Focus (US). Results:A total of 152 patients undergoing DP met the inclusion criteria and were randomized. Due to a positive transection margin on frozen section analysis requiring further resection, seven patients were excluded post-randomization. Therefore, the final population comprised 72 patients in the TS arm and 73 patients in the US arm. Overall, 23 patients (16%) developed POPF. There were 19 grade B (14%) and 4 grade C fistulas (2%). The incidence of POPF was similar between groups (TS 12% vs. US 19%, p=0.191). Conclusion: the present randomized controlled trial of stapled transection using a PGA-reinforced triple-row stapler versus ultrasonic transection with HARMONIC energy devices in elective DP demonstrated no significant difference in POPF rates.

Tri-Staple vs Ultrasonic Scalpel in Distal Pancreatectomy (TRUDY). A randomized controlled, multicenter, patient blinded, superiority trial

De Pastena Matteo
2021-01-01

Abstract

Background: Several systematic reviews have investigated pancreatic stump management to reduce the postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate. The study aimed to evaluate if the parenchymal transection using the triple-row reinforced stapler decreases the incidence of POPF compared with ultrasonic transection after distal pancreatectomy (DP). Methods: a bicentric, phase 3, patient-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted. All patients submitted to elective DP from July 2018 through July 2020 were screened. Exclusion criteria were an extended resection, gastrointestinal resections or anastomoses, and a pancreatic thickness >17 mm measured at the point of parenchymal transection. The experimental group received the Endo GIA Reinforced Reload with Tri-Staple Technology (TS), while the control group the Harmonic Focus (US). Results:A total of 152 patients undergoing DP met the inclusion criteria and were randomized. Due to a positive transection margin on frozen section analysis requiring further resection, seven patients were excluded post-randomization. Therefore, the final population comprised 72 patients in the TS arm and 73 patients in the US arm. Overall, 23 patients (16%) developed POPF. There were 19 grade B (14%) and 4 grade C fistulas (2%). The incidence of POPF was similar between groups (TS 12% vs. US 19%, p=0.191). Conclusion: the present randomized controlled trial of stapled transection using a PGA-reinforced triple-row stapler versus ultrasonic transection with HARMONIC energy devices in elective DP demonstrated no significant difference in POPF rates.
2021
distal pancreatectomy, pancreatic fistula, stapler, ultrasonic dissection
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tesi dottorato.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo Principale
Tipologia: Tesi di dottorato
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 335.12 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
335.12 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1043812
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact