Cimbrian is a German(ic) VO heritage language that does not display the linear V2 restriction: the DP subject can show up before the finite verb together with other constituents while verb-subject inversion a la German only obtains with clitic pronouns. In recent literature on Cimbrian, pronominal subject inversion has been taken as a traditional argument in favor of mandatory V-to-C movement (assuming a split-C configuration). Building on this assumption, the syntax of the enclitic expletive subject, -da/-ta, (which shows up whenever the DP subject does not raise in the C-domain) makes the Cimbrian scenario particularly relevant since it casts light on the correlation between V2 and Nominative case licensing. Our take is that Nominative case in Cimbrian is assigned by C and not by T – as is the case of other Germanic V2 languages – but in a very idiosyncratic way: (i) it applies within the C domain, i.e FinP; (ii) expletive -da/-ta absorbs Nominative case and acts as a defective goal with respect to the “low” subject.
 Basing on the feature-spreading model in Ouali (2008), we take the phasal head C in Cimbrian to “KEEP” its relevant φ- and T-features assigning Nominative case in [Spec,FinP] and triggering mandatory V-movement.


Rethinking V2 and Nominative case assignment: new insights from a Germanic variety in Northern Italy

Ermenegildo Bidese;andrea padovan;Alessandra Tomaselli
2020-01-01

Abstract

Cimbrian is a German(ic) VO heritage language that does not display the linear V2 restriction: the DP subject can show up before the finite verb together with other constituents while verb-subject inversion a la German only obtains with clitic pronouns. In recent literature on Cimbrian, pronominal subject inversion has been taken as a traditional argument in favor of mandatory V-to-C movement (assuming a split-C configuration). Building on this assumption, the syntax of the enclitic expletive subject, -da/-ta, (which shows up whenever the DP subject does not raise in the C-domain) makes the Cimbrian scenario particularly relevant since it casts light on the correlation between V2 and Nominative case licensing. Our take is that Nominative case in Cimbrian is assigned by C and not by T – as is the case of other Germanic V2 languages – but in a very idiosyncratic way: (i) it applies within the C domain, i.e FinP; (ii) expletive -da/-ta absorbs Nominative case and acts as a defective goal with respect to the “low” subject.
 Basing on the feature-spreading model in Ouali (2008), we take the phasal head C in Cimbrian to “KEEP” its relevant φ- and T-features assigning Nominative case in [Spec,FinP] and triggering mandatory V-movement.

2020
9780198844303
Cimbrian, Syntax, Case Assignment, language contact
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
RethinkingV2_FIN.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Accesso ristretto
Dimensione 268.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
268.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/991824
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact