As procedural systems of some Member States allow the claimant to obtain default judgments without examination of the merits (and, therefore, without reasoning) against non-appearing defendants, the principle of mutual recognition may entail a breach of Article 6 ECHR. In Avotins c. Latvia, the Strasbourg Court tackles with the issue in the light of the so-called Bosphorus presumption, which informs the relationship between the EU legal order and the ECHR.

Principio della protezione equivalente fra UE e CEDU e mutuo riconoscimento delle decisioni tra Stati membri: la sentenza della Corte EDU nel caso Avotins c. Lettonia

CIAMPI, Annalisa;STELLA, Marcello
2017-01-01

Abstract

As procedural systems of some Member States allow the claimant to obtain default judgments without examination of the merits (and, therefore, without reasoning) against non-appearing defendants, the principle of mutual recognition may entail a breach of Article 6 ECHR. In Avotins c. Latvia, the Strasbourg Court tackles with the issue in the light of the so-called Bosphorus presumption, which informs the relationship between the EU legal order and the ECHR.
2017
EU Judicial cooperation in civil matters
Mutual recognition
Equivalent protection
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
OSF_2_2017 Ciampi-Stella.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 228.48 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
228.48 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/968105
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact