Abstract: Plant productivity and fruit quality in terms of occurrence of mineral elements and metabolites weredetermined on wild bilberry growing in open and forest stands in a protected area of N-Italy. Plant productivity wassignificantly higher in open stands (3 ± 2.5 compared with 0.03 ± 0.05 fruits per plant) suggesting that both collectionsin the wild and semi-wild cultivation should be planned in open habitats. Results obtained by ionomic and metabolomicanalyses indicated that high quality fruits can be collected in the analyzed area and their nutritional profile did not differbetween open and forest stands. Cyanidin and delphinidin proportion of bilberries from our study area was respectively23.8% and 43.9% of total antocyanin and it is similar to that previously considered peculiar to bilberry fruits of highlatitude regions of Europe and indicative of high quality food properties. A comparison between wild bilberry collectedin the protected area and commercial blueberry was also performed and relevant differences between them detected,confirming the concept that wild bilberry has a better nutritional profile than blueberry.Practical Application: Bilberry fruits provide relevant nutrients to human diet. However, the scarce availability inthe wild is a limiting factor hindering a wider use of this product. In this study we compared plant productivity andnutritional profile of bilberry growing in open and forest sites, demonstrating that they do not differ in terms of mineraland metabolomic contents, whereas plant productivity is by far higher in open sites. This supports the possibility toobtain bilberry fruits by semiwild cultivation maintaining open sites that are also crucial for biodiversity conservation inmountain areas.Introduction

Nutritional Profile and Productivity of Bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) in Different Habitats of a Protected Area of the Eastern Italian Alps

GUZZO, Flavia;
2013-01-01

Abstract

Abstract: Plant productivity and fruit quality in terms of occurrence of mineral elements and metabolites weredetermined on wild bilberry growing in open and forest stands in a protected area of N-Italy. Plant productivity wassignificantly higher in open stands (3 ± 2.5 compared with 0.03 ± 0.05 fruits per plant) suggesting that both collectionsin the wild and semi-wild cultivation should be planned in open habitats. Results obtained by ionomic and metabolomicanalyses indicated that high quality fruits can be collected in the analyzed area and their nutritional profile did not differbetween open and forest stands. Cyanidin and delphinidin proportion of bilberries from our study area was respectively23.8% and 43.9% of total antocyanin and it is similar to that previously considered peculiar to bilberry fruits of highlatitude regions of Europe and indicative of high quality food properties. A comparison between wild bilberry collectedin the protected area and commercial blueberry was also performed and relevant differences between them detected,confirming the concept that wild bilberry has a better nutritional profile than blueberry.Practical Application: Bilberry fruits provide relevant nutrients to human diet. However, the scarce availability inthe wild is a limiting factor hindering a wider use of this product. In this study we compared plant productivity andnutritional profile of bilberry growing in open and forest sites, demonstrating that they do not differ in terms of mineraland metabolomic contents, whereas plant productivity is by far higher in open sites. This supports the possibility toobtain bilberry fruits by semiwild cultivation maintaining open sites that are also crucial for biodiversity conservation inmountain areas.Introduction
2013
commercial blueberry; fruit quality; micro and macro elements; secondary metabolites
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/587351
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 24
social impact