OBJECTIVE:To estimate the proportion of off-label prescriptions of antipsychotics (APs) in ordinary in-patient practice.METHOD:From the South-Verona Psychiatric Case Register all admissions to the in-patient unit during 2001-02 were extracted. Prescriptions of APs were defined off-label when dispensed outside the licensed indications. In addition, the proportion of "non-classical prescriptions" was calculated.RESULTS:During the 2 years surveyed AP agents were prescribed in 311 cases. Nearly 50% of second-generation AP prescriptions were for an off-label indication. In contrast, <15% of first-generation AP prescriptions were for an off-label indication. About 30% of first- and second-generation agents were prescribed for a non-classical indication.CONCLUSION:Approved labels for second-generation AP agents cover a much narrower range of indications than any of the first-generation agents, and this explains the higher proportion of off-label prescriptions. In contrast, the everyday use of first- and second-generation APs cover a similar range of clinical indications.

Off-label and non-classical prescriptions of antipsychotic agents in ordinary inpatient practice

Barbui C.;Nosè M.;Burti L.;Amaddeo F.;Tansella M.
2004-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:To estimate the proportion of off-label prescriptions of antipsychotics (APs) in ordinary in-patient practice.METHOD:From the South-Verona Psychiatric Case Register all admissions to the in-patient unit during 2001-02 were extracted. Prescriptions of APs were defined off-label when dispensed outside the licensed indications. In addition, the proportion of "non-classical prescriptions" was calculated.RESULTS:During the 2 years surveyed AP agents were prescribed in 311 cases. Nearly 50% of second-generation AP prescriptions were for an off-label indication. In contrast, <15% of first-generation AP prescriptions were for an off-label indication. About 30% of first- and second-generation agents were prescribed for a non-classical indication.CONCLUSION:Approved labels for second-generation AP agents cover a much narrower range of indications than any of the first-generation agents, and this explains the higher proportion of off-label prescriptions. In contrast, the everyday use of first- and second-generation APs cover a similar range of clinical indications.
2004
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use; Diagnosis; Differential; Drug Labeling; Drug Prescriptions/statistics &amp; numerical data; Female; Hospitalization; Hospitals; Psychiatric; Humans; International Classification of Diseases; Length of Stay/statistics &amp; numerical data; Male; Middle Aged; Physician's Practice; Patterns/statistics &amp; numerical data; Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis; Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy; Psychotic Disorders/rehabilitation; Questionnaires; Registries
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/303562
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 42
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 42
social impact