Purpose In this study, we investigated the dilemma of devising an operational family business definition in the SME context. The existing family business literature mostly agrees with the validity of a theoretical model called F-PEC, which identifies family businesses by evaluating three dimensions: power, experience, and culture. Nonetheless, empirical studies on family SMEs still use just one or a few elements with many different thresholds to operationally define family SMEs, highlighting an unsolved definitional divergence among scholars, which limits the possibility of investigating the potential effects of family attributes on firms' goals, structures, processes, and performance. Design/methodology/approach Employing ancestry searching, online databases, and issue-by-issue searches from two decades (1990-2019), we analyzed 255 empirical studies that specified a family business's operational definition (despite posing different research questions) and used a sample of small-sized and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Findings Results showed ownership and governance/management are the most used elements in the operational definitions provided in the literature to date, but that there still is not a universally adopted operational definition of family SMEs in use today. Originality/value This paper is one of the first to comprehensively analyze and review the operationalized use of family SME definitions in the literature.

Operationally defining family SMEs: a critical review

Paolo Roffia
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Stefania Moracchiato
Data Curation
;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Purpose In this study, we investigated the dilemma of devising an operational family business definition in the SME context. The existing family business literature mostly agrees with the validity of a theoretical model called F-PEC, which identifies family businesses by evaluating three dimensions: power, experience, and culture. Nonetheless, empirical studies on family SMEs still use just one or a few elements with many different thresholds to operationally define family SMEs, highlighting an unsolved definitional divergence among scholars, which limits the possibility of investigating the potential effects of family attributes on firms' goals, structures, processes, and performance. Design/methodology/approach Employing ancestry searching, online databases, and issue-by-issue searches from two decades (1990-2019), we analyzed 255 empirical studies that specified a family business's operational definition (despite posing different research questions) and used a sample of small-sized and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Findings Results showed ownership and governance/management are the most used elements in the operational definitions provided in the literature to date, but that there still is not a universally adopted operational definition of family SMEs in use today. Originality/value This paper is one of the first to comprehensively analyze and review the operationalized use of family SME definitions in the literature.
2021
SME
Family business
Family SME
Operationalized definition
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Roffia et 2021.Operationally defining family SME JSBED 10-1108_JSBED-11-2020-0399.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 299.59 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
299.59 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11562/1037327
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact